SEND Law Hub
When the system fails, you have the right to challenge it. Mediation, the SEND Tribunal, disability discrimination claims, judicial review and the Local Government Ombudsman all exist for this reason. This chapter explains every route and how to use them.
The 'Every Child Achieving and Thriving' Education White Paper was published in February 2026, alongside a companion document 'SEND Reform: Putting Children and Young People First'. These introduce significant proposed changes including Individual Support Plans, a new three-tier support model, and Specialist Provision Packages. The law documented here — the Children and Families Act 2014 and SEND Code of Practice 2015 — remains in full force until legislation and the updated Code are brought into effect. We will update each page as official text is published. See our SEND Reform 2026 page for a full breakdown.
Disagreements with local authorities and schools are common. This chapter sets out every legal route available — from informal resolution and mediation through to Tribunal, disability discrimination claims, LGO complaints, Secretary of State complaints and judicial review.
Children and Families Act 2014 Section 52. Code of Practice § 11.3 to 11.16
Local authorities must make disagreement resolution services available to parents and young people regardless of whether they have an EHCP. These services must be independent of the local authority. They are voluntary — using them does not affect the right to Tribunal.
Disagreement resolution applies to disputes about school SEN support as well as EHCP disputes, and to disputes involving health and social care as well as education.
Before escalating to Tribunal, there are faster, lower-stress options. Disagreement resolution services can facilitate structured conversations between families and LAs or schools without formal proceedings. They are free to use and do not close off Tribunal rights.
Use them early — but never let informal routes be used to delay a Tribunal appeal past the deadline.
Use disagreement resolution for less adversarial disputes. Always track your Tribunal appeal deadlines separately — informal routes do not extend them unless mediation has been formally completed.
Children and Families Act 2014 Sections 53 and 54. Code of Practice § 11.17 to 11.32
Before appealing most EHCP decisions to Tribunal, parents and young people must contact a mediation adviser and consider whether mediation is appropriate. If they choose not to mediate, they receive a mediation certificate. The certificate is required before the Tribunal appeal can be submitted.
Mediation does not apply to Section I (school name) appeals — families can go directly to Tribunal on placement decisions without mediation.
Mediation is a required step before most Tribunal appeals but it can be declined. Declining still gets you the certificate. The two month Tribunal deadline runs from the LA decision — or from the mediation certificate if you mediate.
Contact a mediation adviser immediately after any appealable LA decision. Do not wait. If you choose not to mediate, request the certificate immediately so you can file the Tribunal appeal.
Children and Families Act 2014 Section 51. Tribunals Courts and Enforcement Act 2007. Code of Practice § 11.33 to 11.60
The SEND Tribunal (First-tier Tribunal, Special Educational Needs and Disability) hears appeals against most local authority decisions about EHCPs. Appealable decisions include refusal to assess, refusal to issue a plan, the contents of the plan including Sections B, F and I, and decisions to cease a plan.
The appeal must generally be lodged within 2 months of the LA decision, or within 1 month of the mediation certificate if mediation was used after the decision.
The Tribunal can order the LA to carry out an assessment, issue a plan, amend a plan, or reinstate a ceased plan. Its orders are binding.
The Tribunal is the most powerful legal remedy available for EHCP disputes. It is independent of the LA. Its orders cannot be ignored. Families win a significant proportion of appeals when they are properly prepared.
Do not be put off by the word Tribunal. Many families represent themselves successfully, especially with support from IPSEA or SOS SEN. The key is tracking deadlines and building a clear evidence base.
Contact IPSEA or SOS SEN as soon as you think an appeal is likely. Start gathering evidence before the final decision arrives. Note the deadline from the date of the LA decision, not the date you receive it.
Equality Act 2010. SEND Code of Practice § 11.61 to 11.75
Schools and LAs must not discriminate against disabled children. This includes direct discrimination, indirect discrimination, and failure to make reasonable adjustments. Disability discrimination claims about schools are heard by the SEND Tribunal.
A disability discrimination claim can run alongside a SEND Tribunal appeal or separately. It applies to admissions, exclusions, and all aspects of school life.
If a school treats your disabled child less favourably, fails to make adjustments, or discriminates in any aspect of school life — from access to trips to exclusion decisions — that is potentially unlawful under the Equality Act, entirely separately from SEND rights.
Document every incident where you believe your child has been treated less favourably because of disability. Consider whether the situation involves both SEN rights and Equality Act rights — both can be pursued. Get support from IPSEA or the Equality Advisory Support Service.
Local Government Act 1974. Code of Practice § 11.76 to 11.84
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman (LGO) investigates complaints about maladministration by local authorities. In SEND, this typically includes failures to follow proper process, failure to complete EHCPs on time, failure to deliver provision, and failure to conduct annual reviews.
The LGO can require the LA to apologise, pay compensation and take corrective action. It cannot order a specific EHCP outcome — that is the Tribunal's role. But it is a powerful route for procedural failures and loss of provision.
The LGO is the right tool when the issue is how the LA behaved, not just what decision it made. Missed deadlines, undelivered provision, lost correspondence and failure to hold reviews are all LGO territory. It is free, accessible, and can result in financial remedy.
Keep a complete paper trail of every missed deadline, every unfulfilled provision commitment, and every procedural failure. Use the LA's formal complaints process first, then escalate to the LGO if the response is inadequate.
Education Act 1996 Section 496 and 497. Code of Practice § 11.85 to 11.87
The Secretary of State can intervene where a local authority is acting unreasonably or failing to perform a duty. This is a high threshold and rarely used for individual cases — but it is available and should not be overlooked where the failure is systemic.
Most individual SEND disputes are better handled through Tribunal or LGO. Secretary of State complaints are most useful where an LA is systematically failing multiple families and you can document a pattern — not just a single case.
Use this route in combination with others, not instead of them. Evidence of systemic failure — multiple families, sustained periods of failure, documented patterns — strengthens any Secretary of State complaint.
Senior Courts Act 1981. Code of Practice § 11.88
Judicial review is the legal mechanism for challenging a public body's decision as unlawful. It can be used where there is no right of appeal — for example, challenging the lawfulness of a policy rather than an individual EHCP decision. It requires permission, is expensive, and should be pursued with legal advice.
JR is not the first port of call for individual EHCP disputes. It is the route when the public body has acted in a way that is fundamentally unlawful — applying an illegal policy, acting irrationally or procedurally improperly — and no other remedy is available or adequate.
Get specialist legal advice before pursuing JR. SEN specialist solicitors and barristers handle this regularly. Public funding through legal aid may be available in some cases.
'Every Child Achieving and Thriving' — DfE, February 2026
The white paper commits to improving the complaints and escalation processes within the SEND system. The detail of what this means — new processes, timescales or routes — has not yet been published. We will update this page when the consultation on the updated SEND Code of Practice includes specific proposals.
Every existing route on this page — mediation, Tribunal, disability discrimination, LGO, Secretary of State, judicial review — remains fully available and unchanged. Do not wait for an improved process that does not yet exist. Use the routes that are available today.
The white paper gives the Children's Commissioner new statutory oversight of SEND reform, including regular public reports identifying failures in the system. Once published, these reports are public documents that families can reference in LGO complaints, Tribunal proceedings and local challenge.
Where a Commissioner report identifies a systemic failure — delayed EHCPs, missing provision, poor AP reintegration — that evidence can support individual complaints. It demonstrates that the failure is documented at national level, not just in your child's case.
As the white paper's proposals become more widely known, local authorities may attempt to apply the new system before it is law. Families may encounter refusals referencing Specialist thresholds, cessations citing the new tier model, or reduced provision justified by forthcoming ISP frameworks. These are unlawful.
All existing dispute resolution routes apply to challenges against this type of premature implementation. A refusal citing the new tier system is still a refusal under Section 36 of the Children and Families Act 2014 — appeal it on that basis.
Tribunal routes — unchanged. Mediation requirement — unchanged. Appeal deadlines — unchanged. LGO jurisdiction — unchanged. Disability discrimination routes — unchanged. Secretary of State and judicial review — unchanged. The white paper proposes future improvements; it does not alter any current right of challenge.
Refusal to assess, plan content, placement, cessation → SEND Tribunal (after mediation contact)
Missed deadlines, undelivered provision, no reviews → LA complaints then LGO
Exclusions, reasonable adjustments, unfair treatment → SEND Tribunal (disability claims)
Systemic unlawful practice, no other remedy → Judicial review with specialist legal advice
